Salam Alaykum brothers and sisters,
As you guys have probably heard, there is often an argument Christians will cite as the Islamic Dilemma, in which in Chapter 10, verse 94 of the Qur’an, Allah Azzawajal advises the Prophet SAW that if he is in doubt of the stories of the Prophets (PBUT), then ask the people who have been given the previous scripture (i.e Jews and Christians). However, there are many other verses alluding to similar points, like 5:47, 5:68, 3:3-4.
However, many Christians will take this verse alone to be full confirmation of the Bible and Torah, which is completely incorrect, as any sane reader can tell from the context. Hence, I have made a small argument defending this. If you guys would like to use it, feel free so we can spread the Haqq, and may Allah the Lord of All Worlds reward me and you. And, feel free to change it to your liking and let me know any ways I can strengthen it, I was pretty lazy with it:
Thesis: Christians often bring up what they call the “Islamic Dilemma,” which claims that the Qur’an affirms the Bible in its current form, so Muslims are supposedly stuck—either the Bible is trustworthy (and Islam contradicts it), or the Qur’an is wrong for affirming a corrupted text. But this argument falls apart when you actually read the Qur’an in context, instead of pulling out slogans.
Let’s take the commonly quoted verse: Qur’an 10:94 –
“If you are in doubt about what We have sent down to you, ask those who read the Scripture before you.”
This is not a blanket endorsement of the entire Bible. Read the surrounding verses. The chapter is talking about previous prophets, their stories, and the message of tawheed (monotheism). The point is: if the Prophet—or by extension, any skeptic—is in doubt about whether God really did send prophets before, or whether the stories of Moses, Noah, Jonah, etc., are real, then go ask the Jews and Christians. Even they affirm these stories. It’s like saying: “If you doubt whether there was an Exodus, go ask them—they’ll confirm that.” That’s it. However, there are many other verses alluding to similar points, like 5:47, 5:68, 3:3-4. These can be refuted as well, but it only takes one verse to break it down.
Now Christians will try to reinforce this “dilemma” by quoting other verses:
Qur’an 5:47 – “Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein…”
But this doesn’t mean the current New Testament. The Qur’an speaks of al-Injil—a singular Gospel revealed to Jesus—not the later writings of Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. If anything, the Bible as we know today is just biographies and testimonies, not revelation in a complete sense. Christians can’t show us this original Gospel. However, we can!
In Sahih al-Bukhari 4953: “Waraqah used to write the Hebrew scriptures. He would write from the Gospel (Injil) in Hebrew as much as Allah willed for him to write.”
This hadith (Bukhari 4953) says Waraqah used to write from the Injil in Hebrew as much as Allah willed. That’s clearly not the four Gospels of the New Testament. First, those were written in Greek, not Hebrew. Second, they were written decades after Jesus, not revealed to him. The Injil in Islamic belief refers to the direct revelation given to Jesus—something more like a scripture, not a biography. So this hadith supports the Qur’an’s view: that the Injil existed, was partially known, and was gradually lost or distorted. It wasn’t the NT canon we have today. That completely undermines the “Islamic Dilemma” argument, which assumes the Qur’an affirms the full modern Bible. It doesn’t.
Moreover, The four Gospels were originally written in Greek, and there’s no evidence that they had been widely translated into Hebrew in the Arabian Peninsula during Waraqah’s time (early 7th century CE).
Now let’s flip the “dilemma” back on the Christians.
Here’s the real dilemma: Jesus tells people to follow the Pharisees.
Matthew 23:2–3 (ESV):
“The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, so do and observe whatever they tell you, but not the works they do. For they preach, but do not practice.”
This is a massive problem. Jesus literally tells his followers to obey the Pharisees because they sit on Moses’ seat, which means they’re the authorities over the Torah—including the written and oral law. This would include the full scope of Mosaic law: dietary rules, ritual purity, the Sabbath laws, even polygamy. That’s how Judaism worked. Pharisaic tradition was the foundation of Second Temple Judaism.
But then in Matthew 15:1–20, Jesus directly challenges the Pharisees’ traditions, calling them man-made. So which is it? Obey everything they say because they sit on Moses’ seat? Or reject their oral laws because they “nullify the word of God”?
You can’t have it both ways. Christians today reject most of the Torah, and definitely the oral law (what eventually became the Talmud). Which is heavily seen in the Letters of Paul, where he constantly reminds people that their works are in vain, and they are saved purely through faith. Yet, Jesus commands people to obey the ones who taught and preserved it. To really reinforce this dilemma; in Matthew 5:19, Jesus says: “Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
And even more ironic—when Christians point to the Qur’an affirming “the Gospel” or “the Torah,” they ignore that it speaks in the singular: al-Injil and al-Tawrah. When Muslims say Injil, it is referring to the GOSPEL OF JESUS. The Qur’an never endorses the New Testament canon (which can be proved through Hadith itself as provided earlier) or the full Pentateuch plus oral rabbinic commentary. It affirms the original revelations given to Jesus and Moses—not later redactions, commentaries, or church councils.
In other words, Christians can’t escape their own bind:
If they follow Jesus, they’re supposed to obey the Pharisees’ teachings, including Torah law.
If they don’t, then they’ve abandoned Jesus’ command.
However, if you would like to say this is not the case, but that Jesus is just GENERALLY confirming what the Pharisees teach, i.e repentance, keeping the law, charity, worship, etc, then you would have to be charitable and accept that the Qur’an also GENERALLY confirms the scripture.
Muslims are simply affirming that God revealed scriptures to earlier prophets—but that human hands altered them. The Qur’an’s recognition is general and principled, not a stamp of approval on every page of the modern Bible.
Also, the fact that the Bible is considered revelation is a laughable claim. They can’t even be considered real eyewitness testimonies! Luke himself says in Luke 1:1-3 he is not a real eye witness, and is just taking from other traditions. But that’s for another discussion!