Hadith rejection, disguised as skepticism, has become way too normal in mainstream Islam. People act like just because Hadiths aren’t the Qur’an ,and were preserved by men, not written by God directly ,that means they’re automatically full of holes.
It goes like this: “They’re not divine → so they can contain error → so they probably do → so I don’t have to accept them.”
What they’re really doing is building a loophole. But here’s the issue ,Islam doesn’t function without Hadiths. People forget that. If you take Hadiths away, you remove the entire practical framework of the religion. What’s left is the Qur’an on its own, without implementation ,and that turns it into something abstract. Something idealistic. Something you interpret instead of something you live.
Hadith is to Qur’an what fuel is to an engine. Without it, you’re not moving. You’re not actually practicing Islam ,you’re theorizing it. And that’s exactly what happened to Christianity: a lot of belief, no blueprint. A moral code that became metaphor instead of action.
So no ,I don’t believe you can be a Muslim while being skeptical of Hadiths. That mindset isn’t about accuracy. It’s not about integrity. It’s just soft rejection dressed up as intellectual caution. The whole “they were written 200 years later” argument sounds smart, but it’s not driven by concern ,it’s driven by doubt.
The truth is, there will never be 100% scientific proof for Hadiths. And that’s fine. Faith isn’t meant to be dissected like a math formula. Part of belief is trusting in what was preserved, not just what was proven. And if God didn’t want the Hadiths to survive, He would’ve erased them ,the same way He wiped out corrupted scripture before delivering the final revelation.
[link] [comments]
from Islam https://ift.tt/09MK4Nb
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours