Why I still can't trust Darwin's Theory!

In 7 points, here are my reasons why I'm not convinced with evolution, you are free to accept it or disagree. ___________________________________________________________ (1) The Wrong Assumptions Kangaroo, a problematic life example against evolution, the complexity is not knowing its origin, but how to identify the kangaroo from its fossils alone? Couldn't find a better view, to be honest! The kangaroo fossils doesn't have much difference from a dinosaur, and you will never find out the kangaroo's sack or its special breastfeeding organ without observational evidence on living kangaroos, so how did evolutionists know that apes without sack didn't exist? ....... They only guessed it from the fossils?! Another contender is the giant Coelacanth, the 400M years old fish that was rumored 100 years ago as extinct and alleged as a link between water and land beings, turned out to be alive in the depths of the Indian Ocean, a fish from the dinosaurs age is still alive on the earth: Don't get deceived by the camera distance, this one can exceed 2 meters in length! Why it didn't evolve from its fossils? ...... Evolutionists classify these cases under the term "Living Fossil", Darwin was smart enough that he predicted the theory to be exploited later, so he coined a temporary term to keep the theory safe from criticism. However, the dispute is not how evolutionists escape from these special cases that contradict evolution, it's the issue how did Darwin conclude the common ancestor idea if he already knew there are races which will never evolve or leave descendants? ..... With his primitive data in the 19th century? A tough example is the Platypus, a living being that is amphibian, reptile-like, duck beak, otters foot, snake fang, beaver's tail, lays eggs, but breastfeeds its children without mammary glands: It's cute, ........... But the venom is not! The problem is not only for classifying this strange animal, but it's near impossible to define its true origins or who are its real ancestors! The platypus is not an ordinary being, it has 5 pairs of chromosomes unlike the 1 pair other mammals have, like literally we are speaking of an alien living on the earth that evolutionists have hard time to deal with, you will be joking if you will to identify this creature by fossils alone: هَٰذَا خَلْقُ اللَّهِ فَأَرُونِي مَاذَا خَلَقَ الَّذِينَ مِن دُونِهِ ۚ بَلِ الظَّالِمُونَ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ ( 31/11 ) This is the creation of Allah. So show Me what those other than Him have created. Rather, the wrongdoers are in clear error. If guessing and theorizing is the tools evolutionists use to conduct these cases, then what about that common human-ape ancestor they didn't find yet? Assumptions made on monkey fossils will never count as evolution evidence, to note a fact: وَمَا يَتَّبِعُ أَكْثَرُهُمْ إِلَّا ظَنًّا ۚ إِنَّ الظَّنَّ لَا يُغْنِي مِنَ الْحَقِّ شَيْئًا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلِيمٌ بِمَا يَفْعَلُونَ ( 10/36 ) And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allah is Knowing of what they do. ___________________________________________________________ (2) The Scandals In Sunnah, a narrator who was known of bad moral or illogical Hadeeth or even lying, any Hadeeth coming solely out of his mouth will fall, and science is not an exception to this law, why it would?! In 1917 a rancher found a skeletal jaw that was rumored by the evolutionist community as the first human in North America, they called it "Nebraska Man": It feels like a science fiction, still no idea why a jaw hyped them so much like this?! The discovery was ambitious, and evolutionists flied high and theorized many things on the Nebraska man like his looks and living, and even his family...... With a jaw! Ten years later, the jaw turned out not to be for a human or even an ape, actually it was an extinct species of an American pig....... Of course, they pretend like it never happened when the 100 years anniversary is in 2027, so it's not far from us. The second guest is a different one, in 1912 a claimed human-ape skull was found in the mines of Piltdown England, so the first human must have came from Europe, notice the photo of Darwin on the wall: Sir Arthur Keith and the gang are about to discover the secret of monga-monga! 40 Years later with some stupid nonsense in the middle, the community found out Piltdown's skull is actually a mingling work of 3 real skulls, a medieval human head, an orangutan jaw, and a chimpanzee tooth. The problem is not that evolutionists brought shame on themselves, it's the fact they couldn't catch or even identify the culprit who started this fraud! A strong 3rd contender is Reiner Protsch, a German anthropologist and former professor in Frankfurt University, he committed: Fraud carbon dates of human fossils. Plagiarism of colleagues researches. Fabricated chimpanzee skulls. Entire human history and evolution data were distorted by his hand. 30 Years old career ended by his misdeeds, instead of shotgunning him to death! Does that mean evolutionists today are lying? ....... Actually we can't disprove their allegations without raising contradictions first, so it's a fair game for us that we can enjoy, but I have no reason to trust their claimed "modern" evidence when fossils and DNA tests are so easy to make up in the lab by professionals: بَلْ نَقْذِفُ بِالْحَقِّ عَلَى الْبَاطِلِ فَيَدْمَغُهُ فَإِذَا هُوَ زَاهِقٌ ۚ وَلَكُمُ الْوَيْلُ مِمَّا تَصِفُونَ ( 21/18 ) Rather, We dash the truth upon falsehood, and it destroys it, and thereupon it departs. And for you is destruction from that which you describe. ___________________________________________________________ (3) The Common Ancestor Myth ۞ وَلَقَدْ كَرَّمْنَا بَنِي آدَمَ وَحَمَلْنَاهُمْ فِي الْبَرِّ وَالْبَحْرِ وَرَزَقْنَاهُم مِّنَ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَفَضَّلْنَاهُمْ عَلَىٰ كَثِيرٍ مِّمَّنْ خَلَقْنَا تَفْضِيلًا ( 17/70 ) And We have certainly honored the children of Adam and carried them on the land and sea and provided for them of the good things and preferred them over much of what We have created, with [definite] preference. 3 Questions no evolutionist answered to me: "Why apes didn't evolve intellect like mankind?" "Why mankind are the only dominant race on the earth?" "Why Tarzan didn't impregnate his gorilla girlfriend in the movie???" 2 Types of atheists will react to those, the smart atheist who knows what he is saying will answer, "we don't know yet!", literally give this man a premium when you see him, he had the courage to spew the truth. However, you will rarely find that honest atheist or even at all, in fact the majority want to chokeslam that pesky Muslim who believes in God, the atheist will throw a random answer in the evolution's name, while he is actually walking into a trap, why? ........... To this day, these questions have no clear answer in evolution! The atheist's unscientific answer will be easy to refute by the observational facts, he will then reach the level to dehumanize himself and tell you: "Mankind are not special at all, why do you believe that?" Look at those humans, they can't even put a flag properly on the moon!! The methodology evolutionists use, if the theory can't answer the question; flip facts on their head, and I won't hide it that sometimes I felt like asking a group of retards! قُلْ هَلْ عِندَكُم مِّنْ عِلْمٍ فَتُخْرِجُوهُ لَنَا ۖ إِن تَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا الظَّنَّ وَإِنْ أَنتُمْ إِلَّا تَخْرُصُونَ ( 6/148 ) Say, "Do you have any knowledge that you can produce for us? You follow not except assumption, and you are not but falsifying." Genetic-wise, humans are 46 in chromosome count, while apes are 48, proposing any of those can evolve to the other by mutating their DNA is a science fiction, no empirical evidence shows you can evolve a mythological common ancestor into 2 other beings with two different chromosome counts, the common ancestor concept has nothing to do with real life. Currently, there are 2 hypothesis that exist based on 2 facts: The mitochondria in mankind's cells are all coming from one female ancestor, they can't be inherited from a common father, so it was metaphorically called: Mitochondrial Eve The Y-chromosome in mankind's DNA are all coming from one male ancestor, they can't be inherited from a common mother, so it was figuratively called: Y-chromosomal Adam Naturally, evolutionists try to deny these by proposing they might not be the only humans who existed at their time, or that there's dispute on the time those virtual Adam and Eve/حواء existed together or that they may did not even historically meet, without evidence! [BBC]: We still have not found the missing link between us and apes! This should give you an idea the future path the theory is going to take 100 years from now: يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّا خَلَقْنَاكُم مِّن ذَكَرٍ وَأُنثَىٰ وَجَعَلْنَاكُمْ شُعُوبًا وَقَبَائِلَ لِتَعَارَفُوا ۚ إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِندَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلِيمٌ خَبِيرٌ ( 49/13 ) O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted. ___________________________________________________________ (4) The Natural Selection Myth Dinosaurs, how does the natural selection stand against their dominant earthly presence? ....... Or give us an explanation to their mysterious disappearance from the earth's face while the weak beings like flies survived? ....... Evolutionists have no explanation to this contradiction! To this day, not a single being was found not adaptive in its environment, and no beings in the animal kingdom jumped in wars with each other to prove the "survival of the fittest" Darwin was imagining in his office. Source: Reality, almost all animals defend their children, the bee will sacrifice its own life to protect its tribe, and dogs and cats can play along even with their language barrier, animals have free will like us, believe it or not: وَمَا مِن دَابَّةٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ وَلَا طَائِرٍ يَطِيرُ بِجَنَاحَيْهِ إِلَّا أُمَمٌ أَمْثَالُكُم ۚ مَّا فَرَّطْنَا فِي الْكِتَابِ مِن شَيْءٍ ۚ ثُمَّ إِلَىٰ رَبِّهِمْ يُحْشَرُونَ ( 6/38 ) And there is no creature on [or within] the earth or bird that flies with its wings except [that they are] communities like you. We have not neglected in the Register a thing. Then unto their Lord they will be gathered. He didn't attack the guy or run away, where is this survival war Darwin said?? Another problem that pains evolutionists so much is the animal behaviour, animals come from their mothers knowing their duties, no creature teaches them anything, they just take life from the front door. If you kept a female dog away from her family, then she matured and gave birth, you will find she is breastfeeding her doggies even when NO ONE taught her why breastfeeding is good!! Let's hope the mods don't flag it inappropriate! Evolutionists escape from this problem by, "These traits must have been genetically transferred to her by the parents, y'know!", and this is unrealistic and false since you have the worker bees and worker ants as life examples, both of them are infertile and both come from their mothers eggs butt-kicked to their jobs without any introduction, they come to life knowing what they are created for. Who taught the bee this impressive architectural design?......No definitive answer! Can evolution explain this amazing fauna for us: "Who taught the baby duckling swimming?" "Who taught the beaver engineering to build a wooden dam?" "Who taught the birds future planing & GPS navigation to travel looking for food?" أَوَلَمْ يَرَوْا إِلَى الطَّيْرِ فَوْقَهُمْ صَافَّاتٍ وَيَقْبِضْنَ ۚ مَا يُمْسِكُهُنَّ إِلَّا الرَّحْمَٰنُ ۚ إِنَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ بَصِيرٌ ( 67/19 ) Do they not see the birds above them with wings outspread and [sometimes] folded in? None holds them [aloft] except the Most Merciful. Indeed He is, of all things, Seeing. My analogy, the animal kingdom has nothing in common with Darwin's proposition, it's like an orchestra where everyone in the band fluently plays his/her role, but we can't see the maestro of this band?! Evolution has no flawless answer who taught life to the animal kingdom, end of the game. ( 16/68 ) And your Lord inspired to the bee, "Take for yourself among the mountains, houses, and among the trees and [in] that which they construct. ( 16/69 ) Then eat from all the fruits and follow the ways of your Lord laid down [for you]." There emerges from their bellies a drink, varying in colors, in which there is healing for people. Indeed in that is a sign for a people who give thought. ___________________________________________________________ (5) The Entropy & 1st Law of Thermodynamics Entropy (2nd law) in noob terms is simply the uncontrolled disorder of the matter, while the 1st thermodynamic law is well known to be that energy doesn't regenerate or vanish but transform. Example of entropy is the sun rays that radiate away in the void, or the perfume spray that propagates away from the bottle, or the heat that moves from the hot cup to the cold air ......... You can't force one of those to return back in their source without exerting work on them and the source itself, life axioms speaking! Evolutionists think it can go up, but why?! 1st law of thermodynamics says we can't expect energy to generate itself but transform, and this only happens (also) by exerting work, like transforming the chemical reactions in battery to DC electrical current, or electrical current passing through wire resistance transforming to heat energy, or heat transforming to chemical energy in combustion chemical reaction, etc..... You need work to transform energy, but who was doing the work during big bang? Evolution, and sorry to wake you up, throws physics out of the window and drags us in a rose-tinted journey of how life came peacefully from the chaotic explosion to intelligently and with zero work done generate and arrange and build itself, and the excuse on this fantasy, "It just needed some billions of years, y'know!"...... أَوَلَمْ يَرَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَنَّ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ كَانَتَا رَتْقًا فَفَتَقْنَاهُمَا ۖ وَجَعَلْنَا مِنَ الْمَاءِ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ حَيٍّ ۖ أَفَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ ( 21/30 ) Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe? Evolution (from its name) simply says the world is evolving to perfection as time is passing, and all energy forms came from the first body at the time of big bang, but no mention how did the first body come to existence or what's outside it or who broke the body or who exerted the work to bring life out of this random useless energy, evolution is literally an optimistic theory! Thermodynamics however, describes that our world is always going to deterioration as time is passing, and deterioration means increasing entropy which translates to destruction, both are looking at time contrarily different, why thermodynamics is a pessimistic field? Can it keep expanding forever? ............. We will see! Because all the matter in existence are not static, from the small electrons orbiting the nucleus of the atom to the gigantic universe expanding every single moment while you are reading this: وَالسَّمَاءَ بَنَيْنَاهَا بِأَيْدٍ وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ ( 51/47 ) And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander. The entire world is moving, its entropy is increasing and the existence is walking to a catastrophic end, all the matter is seeking ultimate equilibrium to rest and die in peace: وَالشَّمْسُ تَجْرِي لِمُسْتَقَرٍّ لَّهَا ۚ ذَٰلِكَ تَقْدِيرُ الْعَزِيزِ الْعَلِيمِ ( 36/38 ) And the sun runs [on course] toward its stopping point. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing. But once the existence reaches that scary moment, the universe will stop expanding and undergo a thermal death, the Final Day for the universe is inescapable fact, the entire existence is not looking for perfection but running on a timer, the Hour is undoubtedly coming: يَوْمَ نَطْوِي السَّمَاءَ كَطَيِّ السِّجِلِّ لِلْكُتُبِ ۚ كَمَا بَدَأْنَا أَوَّلَ خَلْقٍ نُّعِيدُهُ ۚ وَعْدًا عَلَيْنَا ۚ إِنَّا كُنَّا فَاعِلِينَ ( 21/104 ) The Day when We will fold the heaven like the folding of a [written] sheet for the records. As We began the first creation, We will repeat it. [That is] a promise binding upon Us. Indeed, We will do it. ___________________________________________________________ (6) The TPI Luck Factor وَإِن مِّن شَيْءٍ إِلَّا عِندَنَا خَزَائِنُهُ وَمَا نُنَزِّلُهُ إِلَّا بِقَدَرٍ مَّعْلُومٍ ( 15/21 ) And there is not a thing but that with Us are its depositories, and We do not send it down except according to a known measure. TPI, Triosephosphate isomerase, an enzyme found in almost all living beings used as a catalyst to accelerate glycolysis, the breaking down of glucose to produce energy. However, some types of bacteria don't have TPI, because they don't need glycolysis, so how did the nature know that TPI is not useful in those bacteria but useful inside us instead? ...... Natural selection?? ........ Here's the TPI: Left: Atomic view / Center: Simplified Groups view / Right: Solvent Surface view But a side-view is slightly easier to look at: 2 Mirrored halves, it's amazing how complex and organized it is. TPI is a 2 identical protein monomers (dimer), each monomer has 250 amino acids = 500 total! One single unionized amino acid has one amino group (left), one carboxyl group (right), one hydrogen atom + one carbon atom + side chain (center): Can you bring this by coincidence?! ..... You need another 499 to build 1 TPI! I need a rational person to explain how did this monster come to existence by evolution! It's like trying to prove how a scary Concorde will build itself in billions of years challenge, something real life proves its impossibility, if the theory can't simulate the hypothesis it is claiming, then it has no base for its premises except guessing = No Empirical Proof ۞ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُمْسِكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ أَن تَزُولَا ۚ وَلَئِن زَالَتَا إِنْ أَمْسَكَهُمَا مِنْ أَحَدٍ مِّن بَعْدِهِ ۚ إِنَّهُ كَانَ حَلِيمًا غَفُورًا ( 35/41 ) Indeed, Allah holds the heavens and the earth, lest they cease. And if they should cease, no one could hold them [in place] after Him. Indeed, He is Forbearing and Forgiving. TPI protein molecule is one of the finest works of the intelligence powering on this universe, the same intelligence that adjusted the moon's position to the earth lest the living can drown, the same intelligence that adjusted the sun's position to the earth lest the living can burn, the same intelligence that adjusted the earth's rotation speed lest the living can't live their day, الشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ بِحُسْبَانٍ ( 55/5 ) The sun and the moon [move] by precise calculation. The examples are endless, the protein's structure refutes the luck factor Darwin leaned the theory on, how evolutionists will prove the formation of the first cell if they can not prove the formation of its components by luck? Nature doesn't play dice, the Creator left the evidence speak for Him: ( 52/35 ) Or were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]? ( 52/36 ) Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Rather, they are not certain. ___________________________________________________________ (7) The Secret of Life وَيَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ الرُّوحِ ۖ قُلِ الرُّوحُ مِنْ أَمْرِ رَبِّي وَمَا أُوتِيتُم مِّنَ الْعِلْمِ إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ( 17/85 ) And they ask you, [O Muhammad], about the soul. Say, "The soul is of the affair of my Lord. And mankind have not been given of knowledge except a little." A question atheists fail to answer, "If you believe that soul doesn't exist, then revive the guy who died yesterday!", atheists can't fulfill the challenge the Author of the Qur'an left. Actually if that atheist was smart, he would have asked "Why does your God conceal the soul if it really exists? ....What's the point of this when science may discover it later?" The reason behind concealing the secret of life is obvious, if scientists knew how does the soul enter the body and leave it, then mankind would have: Gave life to what has no life = Samiri & the Golden Calf Took life out of the living without killing them = Anti-Christ If they controlled it, they can stop sleeping or impose dreams = Torturing Death will stop, and birth rates will destroy earth's natural balance = Immortality Gave life back to Hitler........ وَلَوِ اتَّبَعَ الْحَقُّ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ لَفَسَدَتِ السَّمَاوَاتُ وَالْأَرْضُ وَمَن فِيهِنَّ ۚ ( 23/71 ) But if the Truth had followed their inclinations, the heavens and the earth and whoever is in them would have been ruined. Out of His mercy, the soul was hidden to keep life balance on the earth, and this is the challenge He left for atheists to get stuck with if they tried interpreting death, they have no idea what will happen to them from this life running in their bodies, they can only perceive part of its effect now: يَعْلَمُونَ ظَاهِرًا مِّنَ الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَهُمْ عَنِ الْآخِرَةِ هُمْ غَافِلُونَ ( 30/7 ) They know what is apparent of the worldly life, but they, of the Hereafter, are unaware. If evolutionists knew how to make the first cell and evolve it to bring this life in existence, then they also discovered the life running inside them, but if they can not..... Then a 1400-years-old challenge is still standing looking for non-existent challengers, we don't have the ultimate truth, only the One who left these signs have it: ( 56/60 ) We have decreed death among you, and We are not to be outdone ( 56/61 ) In that We will change your likenesses and produce you in that [form] which you do not know. ( 56/62 ) And you have already known the first creation, so will you not remember? ___________________________________________________________ Fact I know like my name, atheists have no business with science if they lack faith!! How am I supposed to believe Darwin when we still didn't identify the culprit of Piltdown? .... How can I believe these evidence when an evolution professor in Frankfurt turned out to be a Kaito Kid?? Any person claiming that common ancestor without a truthful proof is not different from the amateurs who theorize Khufu as founder of the Great Pyramid: The Lost Civilization of 'Aad/عاد is not in Arabia! A personal reason I hold for the Qur'an is the role it was doing between the supporters of Aristotle and the End of Time believers, a +2000 years dispute between two groups, look at the timeline: 3rd Century BCE 7th Century 20th Century Aristotle proposed the eternity of the universe and its infinitum with no boundaries to it. Qur'an refused Aristotle's premise in [21:104], and pointed to the first body shattering in [21:30] & cosmic expansions in [51:47]. Hubble & Einstein discovered the divergence of stars and the expanding, years later big bang was standardized and Aristotle's theory was ridiculed. That's one of the reasons why I'm certain of the future path evolution is taking, and also Adam and Eve existence. Although that I don't believe in human evolution, I will not claim that the entire theory is false, it can have some truth behind it if it's backed up by verifiable evidence, given that the Qur'an doesn't deny evolution happening on other creatures or even on extraterrestrial life outside the earth: وَمِنْ آيَاتِهِ خَلْقُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَثَّ فِيهِمَا مِن دَابَّةٍ ۚ وَهُوَ عَلَىٰ جَمْعِهِمْ إِذَا يَشَاءُ قَدِيرٌ ( 42/29 ) And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and earth and what He has dispersed throughout them of creatures. And He, for gathering them when He wills, is competent. Since evolution is still incomplete, then none can claim it undeniable, it's foolish to say that on a theory, and never it will happen: ۞ مَّا أَشْهَدتُّهُمْ خَلْقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَلَا خَلْقَ أَنفُسِهِمْ وَمَا كُنتُ مُتَّخِذَ الْمُضِلِّينَ عَضُدًا ( 18/51 ) I did not make them witness to the creation of the heavens and the earth or to the creation of themselves, and I would not have taken the misguiders as assistants. Peace! submitted by /u/IIWild-HuntII [link] [comments]

from Islam https://ift.tt/2TxpCda